Cid (36immer-Figure 6. NPY Y1R is functionally active in MCF-7 cells.

Cid (36immer-Figure 6. NPY Y1R is functionally active in MCF-7 cells.

Cid (36immer-Figure 6. NPY Y1R is functionally active in MCF-7 cells. Mobilization of intracellular calcium in MCF-7 (L) breast Dium (Lonza) containing 0.5 FCS. For blocking experiments, the following reagents were Cancer cells after stimulation with 10 nM pNPY. Calcium signals were recorded after pre-incubation of the cells with 1 nM 17b-estradiol (E2), E2 (1 nM) plus fulvestrant (100 nM) and vehicle (ethanol at a final concentration of 0.1 ), respectively, for 45 hours. Cells were harvested, washed and loaded with 18325633 fura-2-AM according to standard protocols. The Y1R selective antagonist BIBP3226 (500 nM) was added one minute before NPY stimulation. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051032.gsion), 96 aq. ethanol (263 min), 100 ethanol (263 min), 100 xylene (3 min). Entellan (Merck) was used for covering.Data AnalysisEC50 (effective concentration leading to 50 induction of an effect), IC50 (inhibitor concentration leading to 50 inhibition of an effect) as well as Bmax (max. number of specific binding sites) and KD values were determined by Sigma Plot Software VersionFigure 7. Y1R expression is up-regulated by estradiol. Effect of 17b-estradiol on Y1R expression by human breast cancer cells. Representative curves for specific binding of the Y1R selective radioligand [3H]-UR-MK114 to whole MCF-7 (L) cells after incubation with 1 nM 17b-estradiol or vehicle (ethanol at a final concentration of 0.1 ) for 48 hours (n = 2). Bmax values (fmol/mg) were normalized to protein content. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051032.gNPY Y1 Receptor Down-Regulation by AntiestrogensFigure 8. Y1R up-regulation is mediated by ERa. Y1R expression by MCF-7 (L) cells depending on stimulation with various ER agonists. The Y1R up-regulation induced by 1 nM 17b-estradiol (E2) was set to 18297096 100 . The Y1R content was determined by specific binding of [3H]-URMK114 (12 nM). E2: EC50 = 1666 pM; PPT (ERa selective agonist): EC50 = 0.2560.03 nM, mean values of 2 independent determinations, performed in duplicate, 6 SEM; genistein: EC50 approximately 100 nM (single experiment, performed in duplicate). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051032.g9.0 (Systat Software inc., Chicago, IL) using 4 parameter sigmoid and one site saturation binding fits, respectively. To calculate the number of receptors per cell, the Bmax value was divided by the mean cell number of six identically treated control wells. For the determination of (anti)estrogenic effects on Y1R expression, all mean values of specific binding (dpm/well) were normalized to the mean protein content (mg/well) and are given as percentage of the 17b-estradiol (1 nM) treated controls. Errors of calculated values determined by multiple parameters were estimated according to the Gaussian law of errors. Statistical significance was tested by Student’s t-test. P,0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.Results ER Status, NPY Y1R Protein Expression and Antiestrogen Sensitivity of Breast Cancer CellsER positive (MCF-7 subclones (H), (M), (L); T-47-D: low ER expression, 14 fmol/mg [30]) and negative (MDA-MB-231, HCC1806 and Title Loaded From File HCC1937) breast cancer cell lines were characterized in terms of antiestrogen sensitivity, ER and Y1R expression. Irrespective of the mean ER content, receptor expression in the individual cells of the different subclone populations is very heterogeneous (cf. Fig. S2). In Fig. 2 growth kinetics of MCF-7 subclones MCF-7 (H), MCF-7 (M) and MCF-7 (L) are compared to ER negative MDA-MB-231 cells. The MCF-7 subclones (M) and (L) show considerably decreased sensitivity against 4-hydroxytamoxifen treatment compared to.Cid (36immer-Figure 6. NPY Y1R is functionally active in MCF-7 cells. Mobilization of intracellular calcium in MCF-7 (L) breast cancer cells after stimulation with 10 nM pNPY. Calcium signals were recorded after pre-incubation of the cells with 1 nM 17b-estradiol (E2), E2 (1 nM) plus fulvestrant (100 nM) and vehicle (ethanol at a final concentration of 0.1 ), respectively, for 45 hours. Cells were harvested, washed and loaded with 18325633 fura-2-AM according to standard protocols. The Y1R selective antagonist BIBP3226 (500 nM) was added one minute before NPY stimulation. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051032.gsion), 96 aq. ethanol (263 min), 100 ethanol (263 min), 100 xylene (3 min). Entellan (Merck) was used for covering.Data AnalysisEC50 (effective concentration leading to 50 induction of an effect), IC50 (inhibitor concentration leading to 50 inhibition of an effect) as well as Bmax (max. number of specific binding sites) and KD values were determined by Sigma Plot Software VersionFigure 7. Y1R expression is up-regulated by estradiol. Effect of 17b-estradiol on Y1R expression by human breast cancer cells. Representative curves for specific binding of the Y1R selective radioligand [3H]-UR-MK114 to whole MCF-7 (L) cells after incubation with 1 nM 17b-estradiol or vehicle (ethanol at a final concentration of 0.1 ) for 48 hours (n = 2). Bmax values (fmol/mg) were normalized to protein content. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051032.gNPY Y1 Receptor Down-Regulation by AntiestrogensFigure 8. Y1R up-regulation is mediated by ERa. Y1R expression by MCF-7 (L) cells depending on stimulation with various ER agonists. The Y1R up-regulation induced by 1 nM 17b-estradiol (E2) was set to 18297096 100 . The Y1R content was determined by specific binding of [3H]-URMK114 (12 nM). E2: EC50 = 1666 pM; PPT (ERa selective agonist): EC50 = 0.2560.03 nM, mean values of 2 independent determinations, performed in duplicate, 6 SEM; genistein: EC50 approximately 100 nM (single experiment, performed in duplicate). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051032.g9.0 (Systat Software inc., Chicago, IL) using 4 parameter sigmoid and one site saturation binding fits, respectively. To calculate the number of receptors per cell, the Bmax value was divided by the mean cell number of six identically treated control wells. For the determination of (anti)estrogenic effects on Y1R expression, all mean values of specific binding (dpm/well) were normalized to the mean protein content (mg/well) and are given as percentage of the 17b-estradiol (1 nM) treated controls. Errors of calculated values determined by multiple parameters were estimated according to the Gaussian law of errors. Statistical significance was tested by Student’s t-test. P,0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.Results ER Status, NPY Y1R Protein Expression and Antiestrogen Sensitivity of Breast Cancer CellsER positive (MCF-7 subclones (H), (M), (L); T-47-D: low ER expression, 14 fmol/mg [30]) and negative (MDA-MB-231, HCC1806 and HCC1937) breast cancer cell lines were characterized in terms of antiestrogen sensitivity, ER and Y1R expression. Irrespective of the mean ER content, receptor expression in the individual cells of the different subclone populations is very heterogeneous (cf. Fig. S2). In Fig. 2 growth kinetics of MCF-7 subclones MCF-7 (H), MCF-7 (M) and MCF-7 (L) are compared to ER negative MDA-MB-231 cells. The MCF-7 subclones (M) and (L) show considerably decreased sensitivity against 4-hydroxytamoxifen treatment compared to.

Proton-pump inhibitor

Website: